Literatur

Bohren, M. A., Hofmeyr, G. J., Sakala, C., Fukuzawa, R. K., & Cuthbert, A. (2017). Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 7. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6

de Jonge, A., Dahlen, H., & Downe, S. (2021). ‹Watchful attendance’ during labour and birth. Sexual & Reproductive Healthcare, 28, 100617. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2021.100617

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hebammenwissenschaft (DGHWi) (2019). Unser Leitbild. https://www.dghwi.de/ueber-die-dghwi/leitbild/.

Downe, S., Calleja Agius, J., Balaam, M.-C., & Frith, L. (2020). Understanding childbirth as a complex salutogenic phenomenon: The EU COST BIRTH Action Special Collection. PLOS ONE, 15(8), e0236722. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone. 0236722

Enkin, M. (2006). Beyond evidence: the complexity of birth. Birth, 33(4), S. 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-536X.2006.00117.x

Fontein-Kuipers, Y., de Groot, R., & van Staa, A. (2018). Woman-centered care 2.0: Bringing the concept into focus. European Journal of Midwifery, 2(May). https://doi.org/10.18332/ejm/91492

Hebammengesetz (HebG) vom 22. November 2019 (BGBl. I S. 1759), das durch Artikel 10 des Gesetzes vom 24. Februar 2021 (BGBl. I S. 274) geändert worden ist. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/hebg_2020/BJNR175910019.html.

International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) (2014). Philosophy and Model of Midwifery Care. https://www.internationalmidwives.org/assets/files/definitions-files/2018/06/eng-philosophy-and-model-of-midwifery-care.pdf.

International Confederation of Midwives (ICM) (2019). Essential Competencies for Midwifery Practice. https://internationalmidwives.org/our-work/policy-and-practice/essential-competencies-for-midwifery-practice.html.

Laurent, J., Human, O., Guzmán, C., Roding, E., Scholtes, U., Laet, M., & Mol, A. (2022). Excreting Variously: On Contrasting as an Analytic Technique (S. 186–197). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781478091691-017

Mol, A. (2002). The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham: Duke University Press.

Newnham, E., & Kirkham, M. (2019). Beyond autonomy: Care ethics for midwifery and the humanization of birth. Nursing Ethics, 26(7–8), S. 2147–2157. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733018819119

Newnham, E., & Rothman, B. K. (2022). The quantification of midwifery research: Limiting midwifery knowledge. Birth (Berkeley, Calif.), 49(2), S. 175–178. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12615

Renfrew, M. J., McFadden, A., Bastos, M. H., Campbell, J., Channon, A. A., Cheung, N. F., Silva, D. R. A. D., Downe, S., Kennedy, H. P., Malata, A., McCormick, F., Wick, L., & Declercq, E. (2014). Midwifery and quality care: findings from a new evidence-informed framework for maternal and newborn care. The Lancet, 384(9948), S. 1129–1145. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60789-3

Skeide, A. (2019). Enacting Homebirth Bodies: Midwifery Techniques in Germany. Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry, 43(2), S. 236–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11013-018-9613-8

Strauss, Anselm, und Juliet Corbin. 1996. Grundlagen qualitativer Sozialforschung. Weinheim: Psychologie Verlags Union.

Studien- und Prüfungsverordnung für Hebammen (HebStPrV) vom 8. Januar 2020 (BGBl. I S. 39), die durch Artikel 13 der Verordnung vom 7. Juni 2023 (BGBl. 2023 I Nr. 148) geändert worden ist. https://www.gesetze-im-internet.de/hebstprv/BJNR003900020.html.

van der Waal, R., & van Nistelrooij, I. (2022). Reimagining relationality for reproductive care: Understanding obstetric violence as »separation.« Nursing Ethics, 9697330211051000–9697330211051000. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733 0211051000

World Health Organization (WHO) (2018). WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/ 9789241550215.