Literatur

ACOG: ACOG Committee Opinion No. 731 Summary: Group Prenatal Care. Obstet Gynecol 2018. 131: 616–618 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29470340

Alexander S, Boulvain M, Ceysens G, Haelterman E, Zhang W-H.: Repeat digital cervical assessment in pregnancy for identifying women at risk of preterm labour. Cochrane database Syst Rev 2010. CD005940. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20556763

Enkin M, Keirse M, Neilson J, Crowther C, Duley L, E H: Effektive Betreuung während Schwangerschaft und Geburt. Ein evidenzbasiertes Handbuch für Hebammen und GeburtshelferInnen. 2. Bern: Hans Huber Verlag 2006

Enkin M, Keirse MJ, Neilson J, Crowther C, Duley L, Hodnett E, Hofmeyr GJ: Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth: a synopsis. Birth Berkeley Calif 2001. 22: 101–110

Heberlein EC, Picklesimer AH, Billings DL, Covington-Kolb S, Farber N, Frongillo EA: The comparative effects of group prenatal care on psychosocial outcomes. Arch Womens Ment Health 2016. 19: 259–269 http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00737-015-0564-6

Hildingsson I, Andersson E, Christensson K: Swedish women’s expectations about antenatal care and change over time – A comparative study of two cohorts of women. Sex Reprod Healthc 2014. 5: 51–57. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24814439

Institut für Qualitätssicherung und Transparenz im Gesundheitswesen: Bundesauswertung für das Erfassungsjahr 2017. Geburtshilfe. Berlin 2018. www.iqtig.org

Luyben AG, Fleming VEM: Women’s needs from antenatal care in three European countries. Midwifery 2005. 21: 212–223. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613805000148

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Antenatal Care: Evidence Update May 2013. www.g-ba.de/informationen/richtlinien/19/

Nicolaides KH. A model for a new pyramid of prenatal care based on the 11 to 13 weeks’ assessment. Prenat Diagn 2011. 31: 3–6. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21210474

Wedin K, Molin J, Crang Svalenius EL: Group antenatal care: new pedagogic method for antenatal care—a pilot study. Midwifery 2010; 26: 389–393. www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613808001034

Brown SJ, Sutherland GA, Gunn JM, Yelland JS: Changing models of public antenatal care in Australia: Is current practice meeting the needs of vulnerable populations? Midwifery 2014. 30: 303–309. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24269149

Ickovics JR, Earnshaw V, Lewis JB, Kershaw TS, Magriples U, Stasko E, Rising SS, Cassells A, Cunningham S, Bernstein P, Tobin JN: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial of Group Prenatal Care: Perinatal Outcomes Among Adolescents in New York City Health Centers. Am J Public Health 2016. 106: 359–365 www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26691105

Catling CJ, Medley N, Foureur M, Ryan C, Leap N, Teate A, Homer CS: Group versus conventional antenatal care for women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015. http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD007622.pub3

World Health Organization/WHO: WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. Genf. WHO 2016

« Zurück zum Artikel